The column is crucial
Shim-Pack column enhancement to separate challenging substances
Timofey N. Komarov, Igor E. Shohin, Margarita A. Tokareva, Olga A. Archakova, Dana S. Bogdanova, Alexandra A. Aleshina, Natalia S. Bagaeva, Veronika V. Davydanova – Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics LLC, 117246, Russia, Moscow
Development of new drugs also requires finding new analytical methods to monitor therapies as well as to control the way a drug enters the body, is absorbed and digested, known as pharmacokinetics. The methods must be labor- and cost-efficient. Interaction of the single components of an analytical system such as the chromatograph and the optimal column, is also important.
HPLC with various detection methods is actively used to determine the content of drugs in biological fluids. One of the most difficult practical tasks is the chromatographic separation of poorly retained compounds – drug substances poorly retained on the chromatographic column. Valganciclovir and Ganciclovir are examples of such substances; both are used against herpes viruses – ganciclovir as an infusion and valganciclovir in various dosage forms.
The aim of this study was to develop a method for determination of valganciclovir and ganciclovir in human plasma by LC-MS/MS for pharmacokinetic and TDM studies. This method was developed and validated. Linearity in plasma sample was achieved in the concentration range of 5-1,000 ng/mL for valganciclovir and 50-10,000 ng/mL for ganciclovir.
HPLC as one of the modern analytical techniques is now widely used to determine the content of medicines in biological liquids. Depending on the chromatographic conditions and detector used, it is possible to separate and identify substances with different properties and, especially, the substances having similar structure.
Challenge: separation of medicines
One of the most challenging practical tasks is the separation of the medicines which are weakly retained on a chromatographic column. The various chromatographic methods could be used for that purpose: HILIC (Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography) and ion-exchange columns, ion-pair reagents as eluents etc. However, these approaches may not be effective where a mass spectrometer is used as detector, or when the medicines are measured in complex biological matrices. The case of valganciclovir (VAL, figure 1) and ganciclovir (GAN, figure 2) illustrates this situation.
Ganciclovir was developed initially as a drug for the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection, after which it was discovered that GAN could inhibit in vitro other herpes viruses (human herpes viruses 1 and 2 types, Epstein-Barr viruses, chickenpox virus, human herpes virus type 6 etc). [1] Typically, ganciclovir was used intravenously only during a therapy, and a new prodrug named valganciclovir was developed to increase the bioavailability. Valganciclovir metabolizes easily into ganciclovir which in turn provides a therapeutic effect. [2, 3]
Like many other antiviral drugs, valganciclovir and ganciclovir are both rather hydrophilic substances, as clearly shown by the values of their octanol/water partition coefficients (log P, table 1). These properties must be considered in the development of analysis methods including sample preparation and separation techniques.
Valganciclovir | Ganciclovir | Acyclovir (internal standard, IS) | |
Log P | -0.81 | -1.66 | -0.95 |
pKa | 10.16 | 8.71 | 11.98 |
Reference | [4] | [5] | [6] |
Previous analytical methods using HPLC with UV detection [7, 8, 9] and HPLC coupled with mass spectrometer [10] were not able to measure valganciclovir and ganciclovir simultaneously, rather only one substance at a time.
Optimal chromatographic separation with MS detection
The authors of this publication tried to develop a method for simultaneous determination of GAN and VAL using HPLC-UV, but this method required the use of a specific “YMC-Pack Polyamine II” chromatographic column and setting of eluent flow at 2 mL/min, which significantly increased reagent consumption. Moreover, analysis time was quite long (about 26 minutes) to achieve optimal separation of the substances and internal standard.
The combination of MS detection and chromatographic separation enables reducing the flow rate and significantly reducing the analysis time. This study provides development and validation of the methods for the determination of valganciclovir and ganciclovir in human blood plasma by LC-MS/MS.
Materials and methods
The UHPLC Nexera XR coupled with tandem mass spectrometer LCMS-8040 (both from Shimadzu) were used. Methanol (UHPLC-grade) was purchased from J.T.Backer, acetonitrile (LCMS-grade) from Biosolve, formic acid (98 % pure) and aqueous ammonia (“for analysis” grade) from PanReac. Deionized water was produced by “Milli-Q” system from Millipore. Valganciclovir hydrochloride (USP reference standard, 99.2 %), ganciclovir (USP reference standard, 97.5 %) and acyclovir (ACI) applied as an internal standard (USP reference standard, 94.6 %) were used to prepare stock solutions by dissolving in methanol. Mixed working solutions of GAN and VAL and an ACI working solution were prepared by diluting of stock solutions with the same solvent to the required plasma concentrations (table 2). Stock and working solutions as well as intact blood plasma samples were stored prior to use in a freezer at -45 oC.
Level | Analyte concentration, ng/mL | IS concentration, ng/mL | |
VAL | GAL | ACI | |
1 | 5.00 | 50.00 | 1,000.00 |
2 | 10.00 | 100.00 | 1,000.00 |
3 | 25.00 | 250.00 | 1,000.00 |
4 | 50.00 | 500.00 | 1,000.00 |
5 | 100.00 | 1,000.00 | 1,000.00 |
6 | 250.00 | 2,500.00 | 1,000.00 |
7 | 400.00 | 4,000.00 | 1,000.00 |
8 | 750.00 | 7,500.00 | 1,000.00 |
9 | 1,000.00 | 1,0000.00 | 1,000.00 |
LLOQ | 5.00 | 50.00 | 1,000.00 |
L | 15.00 | 150.00 | 1,000.00 |
M | 500.00 | 5,000.00 | 1,000.00 |
H | 800.00 | 8,000.00 | 1,000.00 |
Sample preparation
10 μL of acyclovir working solution was added to 200 μL of a calibration sample placed in 2 mL Eppendorf centrifuge tubes, 600 μL of acetonitrile were then added, vortexed for ten seconds and centrifuged for 15 min at 13,500 rpm. The resulting supernatant was transferred into vials and placed in the autosampler.
HPLC conditions
Column: | Shim-Pack GWS C18 (5 µm; 150 x 4.6 mm) |
Column temperature: | 40 °C |
Mobile phase (A): | 0.1 % formic acid in water with 0.08 % ammonia (v/v) |
Mobile phase (B): | 0.1 % formic acid, 10 % water in acetonitrile with 0.08 % ammonia (v/v) |
Gradient: | The gradient is shown in table 3 |
Injection volume: | 5 μl |
Time, min. | Mobile phase A, % | Mobile phase B, % | Flow rate, ml/min |
0.00 | 85.00 | 15.00 | 1.00 |
0.70 | 85.00 | 15.00 | |
3.50 | 90.00 | 10.00 | |
4.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
5.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 | |
5.70 | 85.00 | 15.00 | |
7.00 | 85.00 | 15.00 |
MS conditions
Ionization: | ESI, positive |
Nebulizing gas: | 3 L/min |
Drying gas: | 20 L/min |
Heater block: | 400 oC |
Desolvation line: | 200 oC |
VAL: | 355.20 m/z → 152.05 m/z |
GAL: | 255.80 m/z → 152.00 m/z; 255.80 m/z → 134.90 m/z |
ACI: | 226.00 m/z → 152.00 m/z; 226.00 m/z → 134.95 m/z |
Registration time: | 0.00 – 7.00 min |
Results and discussion
Method development
Development of a chromatographic separation method for valganciclovir and ganciclovir is challenging due to their weak retention on “classic” octadecyl columns. Use of the columns with amino groups also did not provide good retention and proper separation of VAL or GAL. An idea was to test C18 columns with different total carbon content (table 4). The best results were achieved using Shim-Pack GWS column with the lowest total carbon content. Despite the insignificant retention of valganciclovir and ganciclovir on this column, the chromatographic peaks were separated from the dead volume, and the method met the requirements of the regulation for the validation, including the “selectivity” parameter.
Method validation
The method was validated based on the guidelines for the examination of medicines [12] as well as FDA [13] and EMA [14] guidelines for the following parameters: selectivity, matrix effect, calibration curve, accuracy, precision, recovery, lower limit of quantification, carry-over and stability.
Selectivity
Six samples of intact plasma obtained from different sources were tested as well as samples of intact plasma spiked with working solutions of valganciclovir and ganciclovir (5 and 50 ng/mL respectively). Additionally, samples of intact plasma with hemolysis and samples with increased lipid content were analyzed. With blank plasma chromatograms (figure 3) intensity of the peaks with the same retention time as the target substances did not exceed 20 % of the signal at LLOQ (Lower Limit Of Quantification) and 5 % of the internal standard signal.
Сhromatographic column | Total carbon content, % |
Surface area, m²/g |
Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 50 × 2 mm, 5 µm |
18,2 | 393 |
Phenomenex Luna NH2 50 × 3 mm. 5 µm | 10.2 | 420 |
Waters XBridge C18 50 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm |
18.0 | 178 |
YMC Hydrosphere C18 100 × 2 mm, 3 µm |
12.2 | 330 |
Shim-pack GWS 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm |
9.5 | 450 |
Matrix effect
The samples including working solutions of valganciclovir, ganciclovir and acyclovir as well as spiked plasma samples were examined to estimate a matrix effect. It was estimated at low (L) and high (H) concentration levels
# | Mf of GAL (Level L) | Mf of ACI (Level L) | Normalised Mf (Level L) | Mf of GAL (Level H) | Mf of ACI (Level H) | Normalised Mf (Level H) |
1 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
2 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.97 |
3 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
4 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.00 |
5 | 0.90 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.97 |
6 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.99 |
Average | 0.90 | Average | 0.99 | |||
CV, % | 2.18 | CV, % | 1.50 |
# | Mf of GAL (Level L) | Mf of ACI (Level L) | Normalised Mf (Level L) | Mf of GAL (Level H) | Mf of ACI (Level H) | Normalised Mf (Level H) |
1 | 1.18 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.04 |
2 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.82 | 1.02 | 0.81 |
3 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.99 | 0.85 |
4 | 1.14 | 1.02 | 1.12 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.98 |
5 | 1.29 | 0.99 | 1.30 | 0.85 | 1.02 | 0.84 |
6 | 1.21 | 1.01 | 1.19 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.98 |
Average | 1.12 | Average | 0.92 | |||
CV, % | 11.56 | CV, % | 10.58 |
Calibration curves
Based on nine samples of intact plasma spiked with acyclovir, valganciclovir and ganciclovir to the concentration levels 1-9
Accuracy and precision
Spiked plasma samples at LLOQ, high, medium and low concentration levels
Injected (ng/mL) | Average found, ng/mL | SD | RSD, % | E, % | ||||||||
(n = 5) | (n = 10) | (n = 15) | (n = 5) | (n = 10) | (n = 15) | (n = 5) | (n = 10) | (n = 15) | (n = 5) | (n = 10) | (n = 15) | |
Valganciclovir | ||||||||||||
5.00 | 5.80 | 5.45 | 5.29 | 0.08 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 1.37 | 11.35 | 10.53 | 16.08 | 8.96 | 5.89 |
15.00 | 14.46 | 14.08 | 13.72 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 4.26 | 5.31 | 5.86 | -3.63 | -6.11 | -8.52 |
500.00 | 550.73 | 561.04 | 563.16 | 5.21 | 12.53 | 10.69 | 0.95 | 2.23 | 1.90 | 10.15 | 12.21 | 12.63 |
800.00 | 893.66 | 901.00 | 900.88 | 12.41 | 13.06 | 12.59 | 1.39 | 1.45 | 1.40 | 11.71 | 12.62 | 12.61 |
Ganciclovir | ||||||||||||
50.00 | 48.32 | 47.39 | 47.18 | 1.13 | 2.33 | 2.06 | 2.33 | 4.91 | 4.37 | -3.35 | -5.21 | -5.65 |
150.00 | 145.73 | 143.35 | 141.91 | 6.62 | 6.30 | 5.73 | 4.27 | 4.39 | 4.04 | -2.85 | -4.44 | -5.39 |
5000.00 | 4740.25 | 4808.83 | 4892.22 | 77.26 | 104.66 | 153.94 | 1.63 | 2.18 | 3.15 | -5.19 | -3.82 | -2.16 |
8000.00 | 7198.32 | 7372.03 | 7482.18 | 146.29 | 225.72 | 252.41 | 2.03 | 3.06 | 3.37 | -10.02 | -7.85 | -6.47 |
Recovery
Three plasma samples spiked at low, medium and high concentration levels as well as QC samples were tested to estimate recovery value. Additionally, the plasma samples with hemolysis and increased lipid content were tested. The results obtained are presented in table 8. According to the regulations, a recovery should not be 100 %, however, it is necessary to ensure efficient and reproducible extraction of the target substances from the biological matrices. RDS of recovery value should not exceed 15 %.
Recovery (Level L), % | Recovery (Level M), % | Recovery (Level H), % | |
Valganciclovir | |||
Average | 88.57 | 98.94 | 101.80 |
SD | 6.78 | 2.76 | 2.48 |
RSD | 7.66 | 2.79 | 2.43 |
Ganciclovir | |||
Average | 93.98 | 90.95 | 98.01 |
SD | 8.64 | 9.83 | 4.44 |
RSD | 9.20 | 10.80 | 4.53 |
Lower limit of quantification
LLOQ level was determined based on linearity, accuracy and precision data. The minimum valganciclovir and ganciclovir concentrations in plasma for which it is possible to quantify VAL and GAL with RSD and E values of no more than 20 % were defined as LLOQ for the method. LLOQ was 5 ng/mL for valganciclovir and 50 ng/mL for ganciclovir. Chromatograms of plasma containing VAL and GAL at LLOQ level are shown in figure 7. The detection limit of valganciclovir was about 0.93 ng/mL, and the detection limit of ganciclovir was about 0.73 ng/mL (signal/noise ratio about 3:1).
Stability
Short-term stability of the samples prepared (autosampler stability and bench-top stability) was confirmed at lower and upper concentration levels. Also, a solution stability of the target substances at three freeze-thaw cycles as well as long-term stability (when stored for 30 and 59 days at a temperature of -45 °C) was confirmed.
Carry-over
There were no peaks with retention time of the target substances on chromatogram when analyzing the blank plasma samples after the calibration samples with the highest concentration level of valganciclovir and ganciclovir.
Conclusion
The LC-MS/MS method for the determination of valganciclovir and ganciclovir in human plasma was developed and validated. Concentration ranges in plasma were 5-1,000 ng/mL for valganciclovir and 50-10,000 ng/mL for ganciclovir. This enables use of the method for both pharmacokinetics studies and therapeutic drug monitoring.
Literature
- Karpov I. A., Salavei M. U.
Valganciclovir as a highly effective drug for the prevention and treatment of herpes infections.
Meditsinskie novosti. 2018;3:56-59. (In Belarus) - Xu H.-R., Li X.-N., Chen W.-L., Liu G.-Y., Chu N.-N., Yu C.
A sensitive assay for simultaneous determination of plasma concentrations of valganciclovir and its active metabolite ganciclovir by LC/MS/MS.
Journal of Chromatography B. 2007;848(2):329-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.053 - Singh O., Saxena S., Mishra S., Khuroo A., Monif T. Determination of valganciclovir and ganciclovir in human plasma by li quid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric detection.
Clinical Biochemistry. 2011;44(10-11):907-915. DOI: 10.1016/j. clinbiochem.2011.04.003 - Valganciclovir. DRUGBANK. Available at: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB01610
- Ganciclovir. DRUGBANK. Available at: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB01004
- Acyclovir. DRUGBANK. Available at: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00787
- Teshima D., Otsubo K., Yoshida T., Itoh Y., Oishi R.
A simple and simultaneous determination of acyclovir and ganciclovir in human plasma by high‐performance liquid chromatography.
Biomedical Chromatography. 2003;17(8):500-503. DOI: 10.1002/bmc.258 - Padullés A., Colom H., Armendariz Y., Cerezo G., Caldes A., Pou L., Torras J., Grinyó J. M., Lloberas N.
Determination of ganciclovir in human plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography – UV detection.
Clinical Biochemistry. 2012;45(4-5):309-314. DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.12.014 - Heinig K., Wirz T., Gajate-Perez A., Belli S. Determination of Ganciclovir and its prodrug Valganciclovir by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2011;879(5-6):436-442. DOI: 10.1016/j. jchromb.2010.12.033
- Dogan-Topal B., Ozkan S. A., Uslu B.
Simultaneous determination of abacavir, efavirenz and valganciclovir in human serum samples by isocratic HPLC-DAD detection.
Chromatographia. 2007;66(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1365/s10337-007-0302-y - Komarov T. N., Shohin I. E., Miskiv O. A., Bogdanova D. S., Aleshina A. V., Medvedev Yu. V., Bagaeva N. S.
Development and Validation of Valganciclovir and its Active Metabolite Ganciclovir Determination in Human Plasma by HPLC-UV Method. Razrabotka i registratsiya lekarstvennykh sredstv = Drug development & registration. 2020;9(2):133-139. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33380/2305-2066-2020-9-2-133-139 - Mironov A. N. Rukovodstvo po ekspertize lekarstvennykh sredstv [Guidelines for the examination of medicines]. V. II. Moscow: Grif i K; 2013: 280 p. (In Russ.)
- Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/bioanalytical-method-validation-guidance-industry
- European Medicines Agency. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/bioanalytical-method-validation